Penry v. Federal Mortgage Bank away from Topeka, 970 F. Supp. 833 (D. Kan. 1997)
D. Brad Bailey, Workplace out-of U.S. Atty., Topeka, KS, Paul F. Figley, Jeffrey L. Karlin, U.S. Dept. off Fairness, Municipal Section, Arizona, *836 DC, Frank W. Cravings, U.S. Dept. from Fairness, Civil Division, Washington, DC, to possess You.S.
This issue is actually until the court towards defendants’ Motion to have Realization Wisdom (Doctor. 104). Plaintiff keeps registered an excellent Memorandum opposed to Defendants’ Actions (Doctor. 121). Defendants provides filed an answer (Doc. 141). This case comes up regarding plaintiff’s claim out of hostile workplace and you may retaliation into the violation out-of Name VII of Civil-rights Act out of 1964, 42 You.S.C. 2000e, as well as deliberate infliction away from psychological distress. Into causes established below, defendants’ action was offered.
Next truth is sometimes uncontroverted otherwise, when the controverted, construed when you look at the a white really advantageous for the plaintiff due to the fact non-moving people. Immaterial things and you can truthful averments maybe not securely supported by the brand new record was excluded.
Government Mortgage Lender of Topeka (“FHLB”) operating Michele Penry (“Penry”) since the a beneficial clerk within the equity company away from February 1989 to help you February 1994, earliest beneath the supervision regarding Sonia Betsworth (“Betsworth”) following, beginning in November off 1992, under the supervision out-of Charles Waggoner (“Waggoner”)

FHLB rented Waggoner in November off 1989 as the equity remark movie director. Included in their duties, Waggoner held to your-webpages inspections out-of collateral during the borrowing from the bank creditors. Continue lendo “Penry v. Federal Mortgage Bank away from Topeka, 970 F. Supp. 833 (D. Kan. 1997)”